Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 103OAG49

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided December 26, 2018No. 103OAG49Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gen. 49] 49 JUVENILE CAUSES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FEDERAL ENCLAVES – WHETHER STATE AUTHORITIES HAVE JURISDICTION OVER JUVENILE OFFENSES ON ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND December 26, 2018 The Honorable Joseph I. Cassilly State’s Attorney for Harford County You have asked for our opinion on whether Maryland authorities have jurisdiction over a juvenile who commits a delinquent act on the Aberdeen Proving Ground (the “Proving Ground”), a U.S. Army facility located in Harford County. The Proving Ground, as we understand it, was acquired by the federal government from Maryland under the Enclave Clause of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Evans v. CornmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. James Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API