Legal Opinion

Modern Woodmen of America v. Casados

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 1, 1936No. 2829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

This cause is submitted for final decree upon motion to dismiss the bill of complaint, the defendants announcing that they do not desire to answer over if the motion is overruled. The underlying questions are (1) whether plaintiff is subject to the two per cent, tax on gross premiums and other fees assessed against insurance companies, and (2) if so, whether the statute imposing such tax is in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. Jurisdiction exists because of diversity of citizenship and the presence of a substantial federal question,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Company v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1963
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. MurphyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1936
  3. Modern Woodmen of America v. CasadosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1937
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CasadosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1938
  5. Basic Services Inc. v. Govt of the VISupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API