Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1916No. Appeal, No. 47PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, No. 47, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment.of O. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 2250, on verdict for plaintiff in case of J. G-. W. Lindemann v. Pittsburgh Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 47, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment.of O. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 2250, on verdict for plaintiff in case of J. G-. W. Lindemann v. Pittsburgh Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion of Brown, J., sur defendant’s motion for a new trial: In a collision between cars Of the defendant company, the evening of September 1, 1912, plaintiff, a passenger on one of them, was seriously injured. He was taken to the Pittsburgh hospital the same evening. His appearance at the trial was pitiful. He…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on tbe opinion of tbe learned court below, denying tbe motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. O'Farrell v. MawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Williams v. Southern Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API