Legal Opinion

Bowman v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1895No. 15959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. .Sandeeson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Respondent, in connection with his lumber business, owned and conducted a railroad running from his mill to the timber, about eight miles distant. Upon Monday morning, December 9th, at 6 o’clock, and while it was yet dark, Victor Bowman, an ordinary laborer, in connection with the engineer, fireman, foreman, and other laborers, started upon a working or construction train over the road. They had proceeded but a few hundred yards when the train ran into a washout some forty feet in length and fourteen feet in depth. Bowman and the engineer were killed, and others of the party injured. This…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vaughn v. California Central RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacheco v. Judson Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. F.R. v. Santa Clara Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API