Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Kirby
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 17, 1934No. 23088PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. The rights and remedies of an injured employee within the scope of the workmen’s compensation act are controlled by its provisions, “exclude all other rights and remedies . . at common law or otherwise on account of such injury,” and are within the sole jurisdiction of the Department of Industrial Delations, subject only to judicial review as provided by the act. Acts 1920, pp. 167, 176, § 12 (Michie’s Code, § 3154 (12); McCoy v. Southern Lumber Co., 38 Ga. App. 251 (2), 252 (143 S. E. 611).
2. Under section 2 (b) of the compensation act, “ minors are included even though working in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Horn v. Planters Products Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Webb v. Tubize-Chatillon Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- McCoy v. Southern Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Echols v. Chattooga Mercantile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Continental Casualty Co. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Hockmuth v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Reid v. Lummus Cotton-Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.