Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Young

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1983No. 14538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Judge Pro Tem.

The present controversy began when Fitzgerald and Mefford undertook a joint venture, called Denton Village, to develop real property located adjacent to farmland owned by Young. It required the design and implementation of a surface water drainage system to accommodate runoff generated by unusual storms. The system developed for Denton Village employed the use of an existing ditch system on the western border of the project through which runoff would drain.

Young’s property lies on the western border of Denton Village. At the easternmost edge of his property are two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rusher v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Melendres v. SoalesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Honeywell, Inc. v. Trend Coin Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Cortez v. University Mall Shopping CenterDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
  3. Alexander Vincent Ray Cave v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Field v. Boyer Co., LCUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Field v. Boyer Co., LCUtah Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API