Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of William B. Dickinson and Bernard L. Zenitz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 22, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6751PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 to 5, all of the claims of appellants’ application for a patent.
The application was filed November 12, 1957 and relates to certain piperidine carboxylic acid derivatives and to a process of preparing them. The compounds claimed are disclosed to be “physiologically active” and “useful as analgesics and narcotics.” Claim 1 is representative of the appealed claims and reads as follows:
“1. A compound selected from the class consisting of ethyl…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Payne v. HurleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Henry St. Pierre v. Draper M. Harvey, Draper M. Harvey v. Henry St. PierreCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of Andrew John MansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Samuel S. Kistler v. Neill WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Golota v. StromCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Schwab v. PittmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.