Legal Opinion
Ryttenberg v. Schefer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HOET, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity brought by the trustee of the firm of Radon & Co., bankrupts, against the members of the firm of Schefer, Schramm & Vogel, to determine the ownership of a fund. Radon & Co. were engaged in the business of commission merchants and dealers in woolen goods, in the city of New York. On December 7, 1897, they made a written agreement with the firm of Schefer, Schramm & Vogel, who were commission merchants in New York, which agreement provided as follows:
“1. Radon & Co. agree to transact all their business through Schefer, Schramm & Yogel. The lease of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Baker v. New York National Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In re RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Pontiac Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- McEldowney v. CardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1911
- Boise v. TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Oil City Motor Co. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.