Legal Opinion

Futrell v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1939No. 11387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, District Judge.

This is an action by E. B. Futrell, appellant, as Receiver of a closed national bank, against Max D. Miller, individually, and as Administrator of the estate of T. C. Conner, deceased, and the heirs at law of said deceased to recover an assessment on the capital stock of the bank. The defendants moved to dismiss on the ground that the facts alleged did not constitute a cause of action. The motion was sustained as to Miller individually and as Administrator but denied as to the heirs. This appeal was taken from an order of the court sustaining the motion as to Miller…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Seabury v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Rankin v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1913
  4. Zimmerman v. CarpenterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota · 1898
  5. Luce v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chiquita Mining Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API