Tumolillo v. Tumolillo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We have examined those contentions of appellant husband which are available on this appeal and find them to be without merit. In the first place the Appellate Division did not hold as a matter of law that the termination of alimony in futuro is always beyond the power of the divorce court, a proposition on which we express no view; it held only that as a matter of law "[t]here is no basis in the record [in this case] for the elimination of alimony in futuro”, a determination with which we agree.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Di Bella v. Di BellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Peter L.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- MTR OF CAMPERLENGO v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lichtman v. GrossbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Harville v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- McClusky v. McCluskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.