Legal Opinion

Di Bella v. Di Bella

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. In addition, plaintiffs constitutional challenge to the statute on equal protection grounds, having been raised for the first time on this appeal, is not entitled to be reviewed by us. It has long been the settled rule that, unless a constitutional argument is properly raised for decision below, it will not be considered in this court (see National Organization for Women v State Div. of Human Rights, 32 NY2d 940; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 162, pp…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Organization for Women v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MTR OF CAMPERLENGO v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Lichtman v. GrossbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Tumolillo v. TumolilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Greenspan v. Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Jones v. HarroldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API