H.J. Holz & Son, Inc. v. Dumas-Thayer
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
H.J. Holz & Son, Inc., and United Contractors of Virginia Group Self-Insurance Association (hereinafter collectively “employer”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission requiring employer to pay for chiropractic treatment rendered to former employee Mathilda Karren Dumas-Thayer (claimant) and to provide her with a panel from which to choose a new treating physician. We hold the record supports the commission’s conclusion that good reason existed under Code § 65.2-603(C) to hold employer financially responsible for claimant’s chiropractic treatment because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Harris v. Diamond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Lynchburg Foundry Co. v. GoadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Barry v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Apple Construction Corp. v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Daugherty v. Industrial Contracting & ErectingIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Rose E. Yahner v. Fire-X Corporation and Commonwealth Contractors Group Self-Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Fairfax County School Board v. Susan Elaine ManolaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.