Legal Opinion

H.J. Holz & Son, Inc. v. Dumas-Thayer

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 19, 2002No. 2063012PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDER, Judge.

H.J. Holz & Son, Inc., and United Contractors of Virginia Group Self-Insurance Association (hereinafter collectively “employer”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission requiring employer to pay for chiropractic treatment rendered to former employee Mathilda Karren Dumas-Thayer (claimant) and to provide her with a panel from which to choose a new treating physician. We hold the record supports the commission’s conclusion that good reason existed under Code § 65.2-603(C) to hold employer financially responsible for claimant’s chiropractic treatment because…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Harris v. Diamond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  4. Lynchburg Foundry Co. v. GoadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. Barry v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  2. Apple Construction Corp. v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  3. Daugherty v. Industrial Contracting & ErectingIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Rose E. Yahner v. Fire-X Corporation and Commonwealth Contractors Group Self-Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  5. Fairfax County School Board v. Susan Elaine ManolaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API