Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pugh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 2006No. C7-97-1350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

William C. Pugh was admitted to the practice of law in Minnesota on October 28,1988. On July 25,1997, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action seeking to have Pugh disbarred based on Pugh’s misappropriation of over $1 million from a real estate closing company he owned. As a result of his misappropriation, Pugh was indicted in federal court on 34 felony counts, including mail fraud, wire fraud, interstate transportation of money obtained by fraud, money laundering, concealment of material facts, and causing the unlawful…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PerezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. United States v. William Charles PughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. PughCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API