Legal Opinion
Rutgers, the State Univ. v. Fogel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 7, 2008No. A-1493-07T2PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
958 A.2d 1014 (2008)
403 N.J. Super. 389
RUTGERS-THE STATE UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff,
v.
Alter FOGEL, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hayt, Hayt & Landau, L.L.C., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-1493-07T2.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 6, 2008.
Decided November 7, 2008.
Law Office of Glen H. Chulsky, Dover and Galex Wolf, L.L.C., North Brunswick, for appellant (Glen H. Chulsky and Andrew R. Wolf, on the brief).
Hayt, Hayt & Landau, L.L.C., for respondent (William J. Malvey, Eatontown and Raymond J. Noonan, Sea Girt, on the brief).
Before Judges LISA,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi CollectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Midland Funding LLC Current Assignee, Etc. v. Bruce Thiel Midland Funding LLC Current Assignee, Etc. v. LuisaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016