Legal Opinion
In re: N.E.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus.
¶ 1 Appellant, the Philadelphia Department of Human Services (DHS), appeals from the Trial Court order of January 4, 2001 in which DHS was ordered to pay a portion of the child, N.E.’s, dental bills.1 We affirm.
¶ 2 On May 17, 2000, N.E.’s mother signed a voluntary placement agreement which resulted in the Trial Court temporarily committing N.E. to DHS and placing the child at Sleighton School as a dependent. DHS was directed to file a dependency petition, and it complied. On July 12, 2000, N.E. was adjudicated dependent and committed to DHS. N.E. remained at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re LowrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Tameka M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re Tameka M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Interest of J.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In re: J.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In re C.W.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re CwCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re NESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.