Shonac Corp. v. Maersk, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff Fritz Companies, Inc.’s (“Fritz”). (Doc. #39). Plaintiff Shonac Corporation contracted with Fritz for the delivery of leather shoes from Brazil, where the shoes were manufactured, to Columbus, Ohio, where Shonac is located. Fritz subcontracted with the other Defendants to assist in this delivery. The container in which the shoes were to have been shipped was empty at the time it arrived in Columbus. Shonac brings…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dimond Rigging Co. v. BDP Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Interested Lloyds Underwriters v. DHL Global ForwardingDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Trustees Main/270 LLC v. ApplianceSmart Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Trustees Main/270 LLC v. ApplianceSmart Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025