Legal Opinion

Queen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1983No. 123-83PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for delivery of marihuana, a controlled substance. Punishment was assessed by the jury at eight years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $5,000. Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was granted in order for this Court to consider appellant’s first ground of error, stated as follows:

“The Court of Appeals incorrectly held that the trial court properly overruled appellant’s motion to set aside the indictment for failure to state the type of *340delivery…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Haecker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Cruise v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Rasmussen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Marable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. United States v. Wayland HinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Whaley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API