Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. Second Injury Fund
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1994No. Docket No. 148065PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The Second Injury Fund appeals by leave granted a December 11, 1991, opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which required the fund to reimburse plaintiffs employer, Prompt Answering/DeBonte Electric (hereinafter Prompt), for a portion of compensation benefits it pays plaintiff.
Plaintiff injured her right knee on June 15, 1985, while working for Prompt. At that time, plaintiff also worked at the Plainfield Drive-In selling movie tickets. The knee injury prevented plaintiff from continuing her employment with Prompt, but did not affect her ability to sell tickets at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowles v. James Lumber CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Leskinen v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Buehler v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Trejo v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Finkbiner v. ITT Building ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence v. Toys R USMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Lawrence v. Toys R USMichigan Supreme Court · 1996