Legal Opinion

Smith v. Whitehead

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1982No. 79-526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellants are police officers who, while engaged with other officers in a valid search of appellees’ apartment for evidence of narcotics possession and dispensation, *342also participated in the seizure of several items of consumer goods from the apartment. The property was turned over to the District Property Clerk, who refused to return it to appellees. This action for conversion against the appellant officers followed. A jury found appellants liable to appellees for compensatory and punitive damages of $2,700.

Appellants contend that the seizure of the goods was lawful, and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mason v. RostadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Cooney v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cooney v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API