Hike v. State

Nebraska Advance Sheets 60 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS policy limits before it and was therefore able to divide pro rata the loss that remained after exhaustion of the two pri- mary policies. Thus, Regent, under its umbrella policy, was liable in contribution to American Family for four-ninths of the cost of payments made and to be made to the guest under American Family’s umbrella policy. We find that apportion- ment was correct. VI. CONCLUSION For all the reasons stated above, we agree with the district court’s apportionment of the common obligation toward the guest’s settlement. We affirm the…