Legal Opinion

Matter of Ihrig v. . Williams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 21, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to grant to the petitioner an inspection of the reports of engineers and of all other reports, records, papers and documents on file in his office relating to the explosion and bursting of a water main which took place in Lafayette…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 21, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to grant to the petitioner an inspection of the reports of engineers and of all other reports, records, papers and documents on file in his office relating to the explosion and bursting of a water main which took place in Lafayette street, near the intersection of said street and Howard street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, on the 21st…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs;' no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, 'Hogan, Caedozo' and McLaughlin, JJ.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Werfel v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Scott v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. HoytNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Young v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Brooklyn Bridge Freezing & Cold Storage Co. v. VurmuhlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API