Legal Opinion
Hocks v. Jeremiah
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 26, 1988No. 8510-06128; CA A43326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Plaintiff, personally and as personal representative of the estate of Robert Hocks (Hocks), appeals from a judgment after trial to the court dismissing her action against Hocks’ sister, defendant Jeremiah, for replevin and conversion of personal property. Defendant asserted that Hocks gave the property to her before his death, and the trial court agreed.
Replevin and conversion are legal claims, Geary v. Prudhomme, 117 Or 165,243 P 101 (1926), subject to review as actions at law. Sautter v. Coffey, 283 Or 303, 584 P2d 245 (1978); Alery and Alery, 203 Or 101, 277 P2d 764 (1955). Defendant’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Tomayko v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Windle, Adm'x v. FlinnOregon Supreme Court · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Kesterson v. CronanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hocks v. JeremiahCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Estate of Cummins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993