Earl Gunsby v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
This case involves the proper application of Hutto v. Ross, 429 U.S. 28, 97 S.Ct. 202, 50 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976), to the admissibility of (1) a statement made by a defendant to the prosecutor, and (2) a deposition taken of the defendant under subpoena from a codefend-ant, both after a plea bargain, which was later set aside at the Government’s request. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court held that both the statement and the deposition were legally involuntary, and therefore inadmissible in the state trial because they violated the defendant’s constitutional right…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hutto v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Horn v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Robert William Strickland v. Robert Francis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ventura-CruelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- State v. HansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.