Munroe v. Munroe
Oregon Supreme Court
Washington county: F. J. Taylor, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. This is a suit for divorce. The plaintiff has also joined in the same suit a claim to recover $1,487 advanced by him at the defendant’s request to pay off a certain mortgage on real property in Washington county then owned by defendant’s mother, and for other equitable relief.
Read the full summary
Washington county: F. J. Taylor, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. This is a suit for divorce. The plaintiff has also joined in the same suit a claim to recover $1,487 advanced by him at the defendant’s request to pay off a certain mortgage on real property in Washington county then owned by defendant’s mother, and for other equitable relief. It is charged that the defendant induced the plaintiff to pay and advance $1,487 by means of fraudulent statements, promises and representations, all of which are particularly alleged. The answer denies most of plaintiff’s allegations, and then recriminates…
1Opinion of the Court
Strahan, O. J.
— After carefully considering the evidence in this case, we have no doubt that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion. The parties were married at Vancouver and returned to Portland where they spent one night together and then the defendant returned to her home in Washington county and never thereafter lived with the plaintiff, and it satifactorily appears from all the circumstances that at the time of the marriage she did not intend to live with him. It is unnecessary to recapitulate the evidence. It must be painful enough in its details to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kellogg v. KelloggOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Baird v. BairdMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Baird v. BairdMontana Supreme Court · 1951