Legal Opinion

Delta Airlines v. Cook

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2005No. 49A02-0401-CV-77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

NAJAM, Judge.

Atlantic Coast Airlines ("ACA") has filed a petition for rehearing asking that we "clarify or alter" our analysis of the modified impact rule in our opinion in this matter. See Delta Airlines v. Cook, 816 N.E.2d 448, 458-60 (Ind.Ct.App.2004). Specifically, ACA contends that "this Court's published decision abrogates the Modified Impact Rule and conflates two distinct rules (the Modified Impact Rule and the Bystander Rule) into an unprecedented rule of 'direct involvement.'" Petition for Rehearing at 3. We grant ACA's petition for rehearing for the limited…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Groves v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Holloway v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Airlines v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Ryan v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Adams v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  5. Adams v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API