Legal Opinion

Geico v. Anshuman Nadkarni

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2021No. 20-15947Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 5 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE No. 20-15947 COMPANY, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01302-LB Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MEMORANDUM* ANSHUMAN NADKARNI AND RENUKA NADKARNI, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 17, 2021 San Francisco, California Before: MURGUIA and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and LEFKOW,** District Judge. Anshuman and Renuka…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Curtis Freeman v. Allstate Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Conestoga Services Corporation v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Swain v. California Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API