Pandey v. Paul Revere Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
*920We are presented with a case which asks whether a disability insurer is required to reimburse its insured’s legal fees and expenses necessitated by an action brought by the insured to collect the benefits provided under the policy. Upon a motion for an award of attorney’s fees made by the plaintiff, Pandey, a judge of the Superior Court summarily rejected his request. Pandey appealed and we affirm.
Pandey’s position, as articulated in his affidavit appended to his motion, was that he was unfairly coerced by the defendant into dismissing his action brought under G. L. c. 93A to recover two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dodd v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Gulezian v. Lincoln InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Jordan v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Massachusetts Adventura Travel, Inc. v. MasonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taveras v. RodriquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Femino v. Manufacturers & Merchants Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
- Whittaker Corp. v. AMERICAN NUCLEAR INSURERSDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009