Gaied v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Malone Jr., J. (dissenting).
As stated by the majority, the issue distills to whether petitioner “maintained a permanent place of *1495abode” pursuant to Tax Law § 605 in order to render him a statutory resident. Significantly, the purpose behind the statutory residence provision is to tax those who “really and [for] all intents and purposes [are] residents of the state” (Matter of Tamagni v Tax Appeals Trib. of State of N.Y., 91 NY2d 530, 535 [1998], cert denied 525 US 931 [1998] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). To that end, “[a] permanent place of abode means a dwelling place of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tamagni v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- El-Tersli v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Schibuk v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Evans v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. BatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951