Legal Opinion
Klapp v. Merwin
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAngell, J.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff was induced through fraud and deceit practiced upon him by defendant, and N. L. Merwin, deceased, of whose estate defendant is executrix, to purchase $50,000 worth of stock in the N. L. Merwin Co., Inc., which stock .the complaint alleges to have been worthless. The answer is a general denial.
Plaintiff has served on defendant a notice that he desires to obtain her testimony by deposition and to examine her regarding statements made by her, and by N. L. Merwin in his lifetime in her presence, “ in and during the negotiations to procure the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oshinsky v. GumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- New York City Car Advertising Co. v. E. Regensburg & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Fey v. WisserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Eagle-Picher Lead Co. v. Mansfield Paint Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Terry v. Ross Heater & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of SperryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Bartenbach v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Sapakas v. ShulskNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Kertz v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of KimmerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.