New York City Car Advertising Co. v. E. Regensburg & Sons, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Finch, J.:
An examination of the defendant upon most of the issues sought was properly ordered, since upon these issues the plaintiff has the affirmative, either because of the nature of the cause of action, or because the plaintiff has assumed the burden by reason of the structure of its pleading. For example, the plaintiff ordinarily would not have the affirmative of showing payment. Where, however, plaintiff has alleged certain payments, resulting in a balance due, which allegations are put in issue by the defendant, plaintiff then has the affirmative of showing the payments made on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Horst v. D. G. Yuengling Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- In re SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re the Estate of SperryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Klapp v. MerwinNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Singer v. National Gum & Mica Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.