Legal Opinion

Matter of Cohen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter arises out of a presentment filed by the District IV Ethics Committee (DEC), which concluded that respondent had committed unethical conduct. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct that violated RPC 1.4, by failing to communicate with his client; RPC 1.3, by failing to pursue a client’s case diligently; RPC 1.1(b), by exhibiting a pervasive pattern of negligence and neglect; and most importantly, RPC 8.4(c), by misrepresenting the status of the case to his client, and by altering the filing date on the complaint in an attempt to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re GoldstaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of GoldsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. In Re McNallySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. Matter of VincentiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Data Systems Analysts, Inc. v. Netplex Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  5. MATTER OF LaVIGNESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API