Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1986No. CA 85-498Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

The majority opinion in this case is bad news for anyone in Arkansas who has ever sold a house with a mortgage on it. The opinion holds that where the owner of a house that is mortgaged sells it to another person who assumes the mortgage and insures the house for his and the mortgage company’s benefit, the seller will still be liable for the amount due on the mortgage if the purchaser is unable to collect on the insurance, even though the mortgage company collects from the insurance company for the full amount of the indebtedness secured by the mortgage. I do not think that this is or should…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howell v. Worth James Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Kissire v. Plunkett-Jarrell Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Baker v. LeighSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Consolidated Underwriters of South Carolina Insurance v. BradshawDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  5. Crone v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API