Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided March 12, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Mark Alan Smith State Representative 506 North West Avenue El Dorado, AR 71730

Dear Representative Smith:

I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following question:

Is it permissible by Arkansas state law to conduct breath alcohol tests on site for Nepco employees working at the Panda Power project?

You report that Nepco is a contractor "building the huge merchant power plant here for Panda." One of your constituents, a registered nurse working for Nepco and certified as a breath alcohol technician, has reportedly been asked "to conduct random, post-accident,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Smith v. American Greetings Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Palmer v. Arkansas Council on Economic EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Hice v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Cassard v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API