Luxenburg v. Aycock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) We think the court should have, sustained the demurrer in whole, instead of sustaining it in part and overruling it in part. In other words, our opinion is that the petition failed in any count to set forth a cause *726of action. The petition alleged in certain counts that the acts of the defendants amounted, under the circumstances, to wilful and wanton misconduct, while in other counts it was averred on the same state of facts that the defendants were guilty of gross negligence; but in the view which we take of the ease it is unnecessary to determine whether…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Andrews & Co. v. KinselSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Epps v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Harris v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Peavy v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Rosenhoff v. SchaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Carpenter v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Meeks v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Ekarika v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.