Legal Opinion

Rosenhoff v. Schaul

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20756PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only ground of special demurrer specifically referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error was aimed at the allegation that the plaintiff requested permission to sit on the front seat with the defendant, who was driving the automobile, and that her request was refused. The demurrer questioned the relevancy of this averment to show gross negligence on the part of tlie defendant. We think the allegation was pertinent to illustrate how intently he was engaged in conversing with the person already seated with him, when he should have been…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Epps v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Harris v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Peavy v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. West v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Hennon v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. McGinnis v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Smith v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API