Legal Opinion

Kapusta v. Gale Corp.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 13, 2006No. Civ. S-03-1232 LKKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

This case is on remand from the Federal Circuit, which vacated this court’s previous Claim Construction Order. Pending before the court now are plaintiffs three motions for summary judgment and defendant’s motion for summary judgment. First, plaintiff argues that it is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of infringement. Second, plaintiff contends that defendant should be precluded from arguing that plaintiffs patent is invalid because defendant will be unable to establish the level of ordinary skill in the art. Third, plaintiff argues that its patent…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API