Legal Opinion

Howard v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 2022No. 1:20-cv-02213Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DELANO HOWARD, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-2213 : Plaintiff : (Judge Conner) : v. : : AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Delano Howard commenced this action against his employer, defendant AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (“AT&T”), alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq.; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 PA. STAT. AND CONS.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API