Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Marriage of Sisk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1994No. 4-93-0501Published

1DissentJustice Steigmann

I cannot agree with the conclusion that the appeal in this case is untimely. The rationale offered for this result transcends the notion of elevating form over substance; it creates substance where none exists and is as untenable in theory as it is in practice.

At the outset, it cannot be overlooked that virtually every signif-

leant document and occurrence upon which the majority relies is not substantiated by the record on appeal. The majority candidly admits that the correspondence between counsel is not included in the record. Moreover, the arguments in the briefs concerning the substance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krieger v. KriegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Welch v. Ro-Mark, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. The PEOPLE v. Scudder Buick, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Anderson v. BiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. McArthur v. WeidertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API