Legal Opinion

The Hobart Manufacturing Company v. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1966No. 16303_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, The Hobart Manufacturing Company, appeals from a final judgment for Defendant-Appellee, The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, entered on a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the Plaintiff’s evidence. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff and Defendant. D. Omer Tobias, an employee of Plaintiff, swindled from the Plaintiff approximately $400,000., therefore this appeal necessitates a determination of the extent of coverage of Clauses 1 and 1(a) of Defendant’s depositor’s forgery bond.

Plaintiff is one of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Sash & Door Co. v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Fifth-Third Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. Royal Jewelers, Inc. v. Tanner & Victory Motor Express, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peters Family Farm, Inc. v. Sav. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API