Royal Jewelers, Inc. v. Tanner & Victory Motor Express, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ:
The appeal is prosecuted by the defendant-appellant, Victory Motor Express, Inc. The judgment under review was entered by the Municipal Court of the City of Dayton, Ohio, on behalf of the plaintiff and against defendant-appellant.
The cause of action was predicated upon a check drawn upon The Farmers Bank, New Lebanon, Ohio, the maker of which was defendant-appellant, payable to Maynard Tanner who endorsed the check to plaintiff. The Statement of Claim alleges that:
“Payment of said check was duly demanded at the bank upon which it was drawn at maturity but same was not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kullberg Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- The Hobart Manufacturing Company v. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966