Legal Opinion

Royal Jewelers, Inc. v. Tanner & Victory Motor Express, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1952No. 2170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ:

The appeal is prosecuted by the defendant-appellant, Victory Motor Express, Inc. The judgment under review was entered by the Municipal Court of the City of Dayton, Ohio, on behalf of the plaintiff and against defendant-appellant.

The cause of action was predicated upon a check drawn upon The Farmers Bank, New Lebanon, Ohio, the maker of which was defendant-appellant, payable to Maynard Tanner who endorsed the check to plaintiff. The Statement of Claim alleges that:

“Payment of said check was duly demanded at the bank upon which it was drawn at maturity but same was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kullberg Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. The Hobart Manufacturing Company v. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API