Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1993No. Nos. WD 45411, WD 47527PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FENNER, Judge.

Appellant, Kenny Hamilton, appeals his conviction, after trial by jury, of burglary in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and armed criminal action. Aso consolidated herein is appellant’s appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for posteonviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Hamilton does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. It suffices to say that Hamilton was found guilty of having forced his way into a house occupied by Paul and Julie Dumsky. Hamilton and another man, Steve Dober, forced their way into the house and threatened…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Utah State Bar v. Summerhayes & Hayden, Public AdjustersUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Manwarren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. ChaddockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API