Legal Opinion
Herrera v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, *208New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 29, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion to dismiss denied, and the complaint reinstated.
Ordinarily the lack of express incorporation of General Municipal Law § 50-h into Public Authorities Law § 1212 would mean that the Statute of Limitations would not be tolled for the period of time between the date defendant noticed plaintiff to appear for an oral examination pursuant to Public Authorities Law §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Serravillo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Hauptman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Simon v. Capital District Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Hernandez v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Ramirez v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cespedes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Williams v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001