Legal Opinion
Marmor v. Port of New York Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.
The Port of New York Authority appearing specially moves for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that the court has jurisdiction neither of the person of the defendant nor of the subject matter.
Defendant is a joint or common agency of two sovereign States, New Jersey and New York; is performing a governmental function in the construction, maintenance and operation *569of bridges and tunnels which project beyond State lines; and is clothed with sovereign immunity. The applicable Port Authority statutes, in effect at the time complained of, did not authorize the suit. The recently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Smith v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Buckles v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Rittmiller v. School Dist. No. 84District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maffei v. Incoporated Town of KemmererWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Orbison v. WELSH, GOVERNORIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Whalen v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Port Authority of New York v. IngramNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.