Palmer v. Mason
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Saginaw. Bill to quiet title as against attachment proceedings. The bill was dismissed below and complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This bill was filed to quiet complainant’s title against attachment proceedings brought by the defendant Bulen in the name of the other defendants to collect a debt against one Witthans, and the court having decreed a dismissal, the complainants appealed. All the parties are citizens of New York except Bulen, who is a citizen of Michigan.
January 9, 1877, Witthans was indebted to Smith & Mason for about $11,000, and feeling that it was questionable whether the' debt could be collected, they entered into a written agreement with Bulen, who thought he could collect it here, to transfer it to him…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Nye v. Van HusanMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Pierson v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
- Bagg v. JeromeMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Columbia Bank v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henderson v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Otte v. LandyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
- Sterling v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Geer v. Traders' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Charles Maloney & Co. v. GonhueMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.