Legal Opinion

Courtney v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 11, 2001No. 09-00-374 CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GAULTNEY, Justice.

The single issue in this case is ineffective assistance of counsel, which appellant Tommy Layne Courtney claims rendered his plea involuntary. A guilty plea is not voluntarily or knowingly made when it is the result of ineffective assistance of counsel. Ex parte Burns, 601 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.Crim.App.1980).

Appellant pled guilty to sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to fifteen (15) years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Prior to appellant’s plea, trial counsel filed a “motion for hearing on competency” in which he alleged…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. In Re Parte Klem, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
  3. Kenrick Tremaine Jones A/K/A Kenrick T. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  4. Anton Devon Nikkynuebe Houston AKA Anton N. Robertson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. Bobby Jacques v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API