Rudlin v. Parker
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
In the trial court Lawrence Parker instituted an action at law against S. E. Rudlin, individually. and trading as Adams Optical Company, for damages for a breach of a written contract of employment. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.
The defense in the trial court was that the defendant was justified in discharging the plaintiff because of misconduct on his part during the course of his employment. The misconduct relied upon as a defense consisted of lewd, indecent, indiscreet proposals, approaches and remarks to a female patient and customer. It was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Virginia Fire & Marine Insurance v. HogueSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- United Dentists, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Ware v. Bankers Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. DanielSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MalbonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Harless v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Taliaferro v. DykstraDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977