Ladegaard v. Connell

In due time the defendants moved to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that it had never been perfected by plaintiff’s filing a bond for costs as required by sec. 274.11 (2) and (3), Stats. 1935. Instead, he had filed.a mere undertaking in the execution of which he had not joined, but which was all that was required by sec. 274.15, Stats., prior to the enactment of ch. 541, Laws of 1935. That was a general revisor’s bill. Section 284 thereof *38amended sub. (2) of sec. 274.11, Stats. 1933, so far as material here, by providing for the service of a bond for costs instead of an undertaking;…