In Re Plaisted Estate
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The question presented in this case is whether the exemption from the State inheritance tax (RSA 86:6 (supp)) of those who take property by virtue of the antilapse statute (RSA 551:12) is to be based upon their relationship to the testator or upon that of the legatee who predeceased the testator. This question has not been decided in this state and the case law in other jurisdictions is relatively sparse. Annot. 168 A.L.R. 271. In the factual context of this case the question may be stated more specifically as whether a State inheritance tax is due the State of New Hampshire (RSA 86:6 (supp))…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BurnisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Estate of BurnisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Application of the State to Subject Property of Said Estate to a Collateral Inheritance Tax v. KilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- First Nat. Bank v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- In re the Estate of KeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Estate of HebertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- In re Estate of HolstSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981