Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Holst

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 5, 1981No. 80-430Published

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The question presented is whether the “tax clause” in the decedent’s will demonstrates a testamentary intent against apportionment of taxes as provided for under RSA ch. 88-A. The Probate Court (Cushing, J.) ruled that:

“[A]ll taxes due the State of New Hampshire under R.S.A. 86:6 on all property passing under the will . . . , [and] all property passing outside of said will including the inter vivos trust be paid out of the residue of the probate estate. The court also rules and decrees that all Federal Estate taxes including the amount due the State of New Hampshire both on property passing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Annie G. Crozier EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  2. In Re Grondin EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
  3. Kingsbury v. BazeleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. In Re Robbins EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. In Re Whitelaw EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API