Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 27, 2026No. 42/25Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Kyeem Antonio King, No. 42, September Term, 2025. Opinion by Killough, J. CRIMINAL LAW – WAIVER – ABRUQUAH CLAIM The Supreme Court of Maryland held that the rule announced in Abruquah v. State,

483 Md. 637

(2023), which barred unqualified firearms identification testimony on the record presented in that case, was a case-specific determination and not a categorical rule. Here, Respondent waived his challenge to the reliability of the firearms identification methodology. Even had his challenge been merely unpreserved, as opposed to waived, the Supreme Court of Maryland held…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Rafaela Cortes-Irizarry v. Corporacin Insular De SegurosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API